💡 How to use these prompts:
Replace everything in [BRACKETS] with your specific details before sending.
Click Copy to copy any prompt to your clipboard instantly.
I am going to paste [NUMBER] sources on [TOPIC]. Please: 1. Identify the main points all sources agree on 2. Note where sources disagree and why 3. Identify the strongest evidence across all sources 4. Flag anything unsupported or contradicted 5. Produce a synthesized summary in [NUMBER] paragraphs [PASTE ALL SOURCES]
Please analyze the following long document and provide: 1. An executive summary (3-4 sentences) 2. The 7 most important points 3. Any claims that seem questionable 4. Action items or decisions required 5. Anything that appears contradictory [PASTE DOCUMENT — up to 1M tokens supported]
Analyze [COMPANY/PRODUCT] vs [COMPETITOR 1] and [COMPETITOR 2]. Structure as an intelligence report covering: 1. Market positioning of each 2. Product strengths and weaknesses 3. Pricing and business model comparison 4. Target customer differences 5. Strategic direction signals 6. Direct verdict: who wins for which buyer
I believe [YOUR POSITION OR PLAN]. Play devil's advocate. Give me the strongest possible case AGAINST this position: 1. The 5 most compelling arguments against it 2. Evidence or examples that undermine it 3. What I am probably overestimating 4. What I am probably underestimating 5. The conditions under which I would be completely wrong Be rigorous. Do not soften the critique.
I have a meeting about [TOPIC] with [AUDIENCE]. Give me: 1. A 2-minute verbal summary I can open with 2. The 5 most important facts or data points 3. 3 questions I should be prepared to answer 4. 3 questions I should ask 5. Any recent developments in the last 30 days I should know about
Analyze the following argument for logical fallacies and weak reasoning: [PASTE ARGUMENT OR ARTICLE] 1. Identify each logical fallacy by name and explain it 2. Point to the specific sentence containing the fallacy 3. Suggest how the argument could be made more rigorously 4. Rate the overall quality of reasoning on a scale of 1-10 with explanation