TUE, OCTOBER 20, 2026
Independent · In‑Depth · Practitioner‑Tested
Large Language Models

Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol (2026): $5/M vs $5/M — Which Frontier Model Wins?

Same Price, Different Strengths — Anthropic's New Flagship vs OpenAI's Flagship

🕐 6 min read 👁 1,893 views 📅 Jul 26, 2026
STATUS UPDATE — 8 OCTOBER 2026

This comparison covers a retired model generation. GPT-5.6 Sol, Terra and Luna have been replaced by GPT-6.

● GPT-6 Sol — ChatGPT Plus, Pro, Business and Enterprise since 7 October 2026
● GPT-6 Luna — ChatGPT Free and Go since 8 October 2026. In the API at $0.10 / $0.50 per million tokens
● GPT-6.1 Sol — $2.00 / $10.00 per million tokens

The comparison below is kept for reference on how the 5.6 line behaved. For current pricing see the October 2026 model pricing table.

QUICK VERDICT — JULY 25, 2026

● Better overall intelligence (AA Index): GPT-5.6 Sol — 58.9 (#2) vs Opus 5 not yet ranked
● Better ARC-AGI-3: Claude Opus 5 — 30.2% (3× next closest model)
● Better output price: Claude Opus 5 — $25/M vs Sol $30/M
● Better effort control: Claude Opus 5 — 5-level toggle vs Sol's Max Reasoning (binary)
● Better writing quality: Claude Opus 5 — Anthropic's consistent strength
● Better tool access in voice: Claude Opus 5 — Gmail/Slack/Canva mid-conversation
● US data residency: Both — Anthropic US, OpenAI US
FeatureClaude Opus 5GPT-5.6 Sol
Input /1M$5$5
Output /1M$25$30
AA Intelligence IndexNot yet ranked58.9 (#2)
ARC-AGI-330.2%Not published
Effort control5-level toggleMax Reasoning (binary)
Voice tool accessGmail, Slack, CanvaNo tool access in voice
Hard refusalsReplaced by auto-fallbackStandard refusal policy

Decision Framework

Claude Opus 5 for: Writing quality (Anthropic's consistent benchmark advantage), long-form content, analysis, agentic workflows needing fine-grained cost control (5-level effort toggle), voice with Gmail/Slack tool access, and production workloads that can't tolerate hard refusals (auto-fallback). 17% cheaper on output.

GPT-5.6 Sol for: Overall intelligence benchmark leadership (AA Index #2 at 58.9 — Opus 5 not yet ranked), web research (essentially level on research tasks per Anthropic's own disclosure), ChatGPT Work persistent sessions, and OpenAI ecosystem integrations (Canvas, Code Interpreter, Codex). Sol's full-duplex GPT-Live voice is also more natural conversationally than Opus 5's turn-based voice.

Last updated July 25, 2026. Related: Claude Opus 5 full review → · Claude Opus 5 vs Fable 5 → · Claude voice vs ChatGPT voice →

⚖ Our Verdict

Claude Opus 5 wins on output price ($25 vs Sol $30/M), ARC-AGI-3 (30.2% — Sol not published), effort control (5-level vs binary), writing quality, voice tool access (Gmail/Slack), and automatic fallback replacing hard refusals. GPT-5.6 Sol wins on AA Intelligence Index (#2, 58.9 — Opus 5 not yet ranked), full-duplex voice naturalness, and ChatGPT Work persistent sessions.